Anarcho-environmentalism allegorised

The name Anaarkali in the present context has many meanings - Anaar symbolises the anarchism of the Bhils and kali which means flower bud in Hindi stands for their traditional environmentalism. Anaar in Hindi can also mean the fruit pomegranate which is said to be a panacea for many ills as in the Hindi idiom - "Ek anar sou bimar - One pomegranate for a hundred ill people"! - which describes a situation in which there is only one remedy available for giving to a hundred ill people and so the problem is who to give it to. Thus this name indicates that anarcho-environmentalism is the only cure for the many diseases of modern development! Similarly kali can also imply a budding anarcho-environmentalist movement. Finally according to a legend that is considered to be apocryphal by historians Anarkali was the lover of Prince Salim who was later to become the Mughal emperor Jehangir. Emperor Akbar did not approve of this romance of his son and ordered Anarkali to be bricked in alive into a wall in Lahore in Pakistan but she escaped. Allegorically this means that anarcho-environmentalists can succeed in bringing about the escape of humankind from the self-destructive love of modern development that it is enamoured of at the moment and they will do this by simultaneously supporting women's struggles for their rights.

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

Fighting for Habitat Rights in Abujhmarh

Naresh Biswas, a tribal rights activist who has been fighting for the grant of habitat rights to the Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups under the Forest Rights Act writes about the obstacles to the process in Abujhmarh in south Chhattisgarh -
Abujhmarh in the extreme south of the state of Chhattisgarh has a unique geography of dense forests in a hilly area crisscrossed by rivers. Peopled by the Maria Adivasis it has become notorious as the stronghold of the Maoists who are conducting an armed struggle against the Indian State. These days Abujhmarh is in the news again as the Maria Adivasis, who are classified as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), are preparing to claim Habitat Rights under the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Rights) Act 2006. The statute, which is popularly known as the Forest Rights Act (FRA) in section 3 (1)(e), provides as follows - "In view of the differential vulnerability of Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups among the forest dwellers, the District Level Committee should play a pro-active role in ensuring that all PVTGs receive habitat rights in consultation with the concerned PVTGs’ traditional institutions of these groups, after filing claims before the gram sabha.” Thus, in addition to individual and community rights, the PVTGs can claim habitat rights to a contiguous area they have been residing in for generations.
The first meeting in this regard was held on 23rd June 2019 in Narayanpur which is one of the district headquarters in the Abujhmarh area which is spread over the three districts of Narayanpur, Dantewara and Bijapur in the South Bastar region. I was also present in the meeting. I had been invited to speak about the process that had been adopted by the Baiga Adivasis in Dindori district who had successfully claimed the Habitat Rights for their area for the first time in the country as is detailed here. This was a civil society initiative and so the Narayanpur district administration did not give it any importance. However, later I had a discussion with the district administration on 7th August 2019 and after that a workshop on Habitat Rights was organised on 27th August 2019 in which the members of the District Level Forest Rights Committee and the Subdivisional Level Forest Rights Committees participated. A consultation followed on 14th September 2019 with the traditional Mukhia Majhis, Gaytas and Patels of the Abujhmaria Adivasis under the provisions of the FRA for habitat rights organised by the District Level Forest Rights Committee. I too was present in this consultation in which the Abujhmaria Adivasis passed a resolution to claim habitat rights.

The process of documentation, mapping and filing of claims for habitat rights was taken forward after this consultation by the district administration in association with the Abujhmaria Adivasi community. However, five months after this process had started suddenly the Maoists opposed this it. The Marh Divisional Committee of the Maoists published three pamphlets in Marhi and Hindi languages opposing the process of claiming Habitat Rights. They said that this was a fraud being committed by the Government to give the Adivasis only one or two acres and the rest would be given to capitalists to set up industries. This was a gross distortion of the provisions of the FRA which if properly implemented would give Maria Adivasis the habitat rights to the whole Abujhmarh area which covers 3905 square kilometers across 237 villages in 37 Gram Panchayats. This area has never been surveyed and so is not there in either the revenue or the forest department records.
The opposition to the Maria Adivasis claim to habitat rights over the whole of Abujhmarh comes not only from the Maoists but also local political leaders and the district administration. These latter want that the Adivasis should be given individual land holding rights and a process of mapping through satellite imagery has been started by IIT Roorkee to this end. These leaders who are not Maria Adivasis had to stop their demand for individual rights after the Abujhmaria Adivasis expressed their desire to claim habitat rights to the whole of Abujhmarh instead. Currently the Abujhmarias use their land under the direction of their traditional community leaders and so they are apprehensive of the process initiated by the Chhattisgarh Government on 30th August 2019 of declaring the whole of Abujhmarh a revenue area and giving individual and community rights to the Adivasis instead of habitat rights as is their right under FRA. Once the area becomes recorded as revenue land then its sale and purchase and transfer for industrial use will become possible and this is what the Government, local  non Maria Adivasi leaders and the district administration want.
The Abujhmarias, however want the area to be handed over to their traditional communities under habitat rights. The Abujhmarias practice slash and burn shifting cultivation which they call penda kheti. Because the area is hilly only about 1 percent of the land is suitable for settled agriculture and the rest is under shifting cultivation. The Government wants to put a stop to shifting cultivation and that is why it wants to settle the Abujhmarias in a permanent piece of land and claim the rest of the forests for itself. Since the population of the Abujhmarias is very low compared to the huge area of dense forests, their shifting cultivation does not affect it and instead it has been hailed as a very good means of maintaining the forests while also providing sustenance to the Adivasis. The Government of Madhya Pradesh had made a rule on 8th February 1991, before the state of Chhattisgarh was created in 2000, preventing entry of outsiders into Abujhmarh. Thus, even though there was not official survey of the area, the Abujhmarias had a clear idea of the extent of their traditional habitat. Thus, the state should assist the Abujhmaria Adivasis to prepare a map of their traditional habitat and grant them habitat rights in their area as per the provisions of the FRA.
The Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) Government of India had circulated guidelines for the implementation of habitat rights to the Governments of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Odisha on 13th November 2014 but these Governments had ignored them and not done anything towards their implementation. These guidelines were sent again to the states by MoTA on 18th December 2019. A letter was also sent to the Chief Secretaries of all concerned states on 23rd April 2015 clarifying what was meant by habitat rights. A letter has also been sent to the Directors of the Tribal Research Institutes of all concerned states on 17th December 2019 asking them to provide research support for the implementation of habitat rights of PVTGs.
There are five PVTGs in Chhattisgarh. Apart from the Abujhmarias, there are the Pahari Korbas, Birhors, Baigas, and Kamars. However, in the absence of a standard set of guidelines for implementation of habitat rights, the district administrations concerned have not initiated the process of granting them to these PVTGs. The MoTA has constituted an expert committee on 21st February 2020 to draw up guidelines for the implementation of habitat rights in a simple manner by the concerned district administration. The first meeting of this expert committee was held on 16th March 2020 in Delhi. A team of this expert committee is scheduled to visit Abujhmarh in the near future. Thus, the moment is ripe for the grant of habitat rights to the Abujhmarias. Even though the MoTA is keen on the implementation of habitat rights the state governments and district administrations are not showing any enthusiasm for this. So apart from the Baiga Adivasis of Madhya Pradesh none of the other PVTGs have got habitat rights yet. Both the Maoists and the Government should cooperate and assist the Abujhmarias to get their habitat rights and so continue to maintain their forests and their agriculture in their traditional manner.

No comments: