Anarcho-environmentalism allegorised

The name Anaarkali in the present context has many meanings - Anaar symbolises the anarchism of the Bhils and kali which means flower bud in Hindi stands for their traditional environmentalism. Anaar in Hindi can also mean the fruit pomegranate which is said to be a panacea for many ills as in the Hindi idiom - "Ek anar sou bimar - One pomegranate for a hundred ill people"! - which describes a situation in which there is only one remedy available for giving to a hundred ill people and so the problem is who to give it to. Thus this name indicates that anarcho-environmentalism is the only cure for the many diseases of modern development! Similarly kali can also imply a budding anarcho-environmentalist movement. Finally according to a legend that is considered to be apocryphal by historians Anarkali was the lover of Prince Salim who was later to become the Mughal emperor Jehangir. Emperor Akbar did not approve of this romance of his son and ordered Anarkali to be bricked in alive into a wall in Lahore in Pakistan but she escaped. Allegorically this means that anarcho-environmentalists can succeed in bringing about the escape of humankind from the self-destructive love of modern development that it is enamoured of at the moment and they will do this by simultaneously supporting women's struggles for their rights.

Monday, May 18, 2020

Invisible Labour

The passing of ordinances by a few states suspending the operation of labour laws in the wake of the Covid 19 pandemic has led to a hue and cry. However, except for permanent employees in Government enterprises and departments and in a few private establishments, labour laws are only there on paper for 98% of the industrial and service sector workforce in this country who are contractually employed. This is because these workers are invisible. They are not there on the official rolls of either the principal employers or the contractors and sub-contractors. The moment workers are registered officially, even if they are contract workers, they become eligible for various benefits under the labour laws which pushes up the cost of labour for the employers substantially. Beginning with having to pay statutory minimum wages, the employers have to provide provident fund contributions, health insurance, transport and housing allowances. They also have to ensure proper working conditions as per the provisions of the Factories Act which too have a cost.
The Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action, in Ahmedabad, which along with its sister organisation, Majoor Adhikar Manch, works for the rights of workers in Gujarat, conducted a survey of workers in the industrial areas in Kadi and Kalol talukas near Ahmedabad. The results of the survey reveal that -
i. The firms in which the respondents of the survey work are mostly doing fairly well as far as growth in income, profit after tax and balance sheet is concerned but they are not giving the benefit of this growth to their workers in the form of fair wages and other facilities.
ii. Most of the workers are not being paid minimum wages, given statutory benefits.
iii. Most of the workers are employed on contract either by the company itself or by contractors without any formal agreement.
iv. Union formation is actively discouraged by the employers and the administration and police side with the management in cases of strikes. So, there is considerable fear among the respondents that their jobs will be taken away if they organise. This is despite the fact that they are aware that they are being exploited by being given almost half the wages as compared to what they need to lead a dignified life.
v. Women are mostly in packaging jobs and are paid less than men. They do not get maternity leave and other statutory gender benefits.
Thus, Arvind Mills, which is an internationally renowned large textile company with its plant in Santej in the Kalol industrial area in Gujarat near Ahmedabad with annual income in 2019 of Rs 6645 crores and a profit after tax of Rs 199 crores, officially reported that it has 7486 employees but in reality it employs more than 15000. A substantial number of those on the official rolls are mostly managerial and accounts staff who are crucial to the running of the factory and the company. The workers on the shop floor are on its unofficial rolls without any official agreement even though they have worked for more than a decade and so are not officially declared as its employees. There was a strike in 2015 at the Santej factory against the heavy work load for the employees and the low wages they were being paid in violation of the statutory minimum wage norms. The strike was resolved with an agreement to reduce the workload and increase wages. However, once work started again, the workers who led the strike were dismissed and the agreement dishonoured. These workers are fighting cases against their dismissal in the labour court while the workers who are still employed are labouring as before under adverse working conditions and being paid low wages.  This is the case with many other big companies like Hitachi, Torrent, Adani etc which have their plants in this area. This is the situation throughout the country.
This invisibility increases even more with the migrant labourers. They are kept in colonies within the factory premises and they are not allowed to mingle with the local population. Thus, the CLRA and MAM activists found it near impossible to talk to these workers. The migrant labourers have been brought in, not because there is a shortage of local labourers, but because they are prepared to work for lower wages and are unlikely to unionise given their lack of local roots. Thus, the huge migrant labour work force which according to some estimates is around 100 million across India is strategically used by the employers to keep wages depressed. A right to information application filed with the government labour department for data on the workers employed in the area drew a blank response as the department said that they do not have any records since the industrial establishments were not filing the reports that they are mandated to do under various laws. Even though the laws empower the government to regulate the employers so as to ensure that the rights of workers are not compromised yet such is the power of the employers that the labour department does not carry out its responsibilities. 
This is what Marx had described as primitive accumulation. The blatant exploitation of labour in the early phase of capitalist development when not much skills were required to run the machines and there were a huge number of serfs being displaced from agriculture. While later the advance in technology required skilled labour and they were able to unionise to get many labour rights, further advancement in technology has meant that the number of skilled workers required has gone down drastically and the workers required for other ancillary activities can be employed on contract. This has resulted in the bottom falling out of worker's unions and they have become powerless. So only a very few workers are in official employment in accordance with labour laws and a huge number are on contract and invisible. 
The imposition of the lockdown immediately jeopardised the livelihoods of all these contract workers. The employers could easily see that their cash flows would be stopped while even in lockdown many expenses would continue and so they not only stopped paying this vast contract work force but also did not pay their pending wages to conserve their resources. They do not give a fig for the workers in normal course so it is only to be expected that they will care even less for their plight in a situation of lockdown. Neither are Governments, either at the Centre or the States concerned because they too have been colluding with the employers to promote primitive accumulation. The Governments' cash flows too have been adversely affected as a consequence of the lockdown and so they too are least interested in providing for the workers. 
The migrant workers have become visible because they have started going back to their homes but the much larger local work force still remains invisible and in dire straits. They too are hungry and penniless but since they are at home they are not visible to the world at large nobody is bothered about them. So even though Governments have now begun to do a little bit for the migrant labour because they have become visible, they are still mum about the rest of the work force. 
In the wake of the suffering of the migrants trying to return,  many people have asked why they were not better provided for? But no one is asking why the much larger local labour force is not being better provided for. The answer is that neither the employers nor the government are bothered to provide for labour whether migrant or local as any show of sympathy will hike up labour costs in future and hinder primitive accumulation. There is no shortage of labour and so if some of them suffer and die it wont affect the labour supply as others, who are impoverished will replace them. 
This government, like earlier governments since independence has shown scant regard for the poor whether in rural areas or in urban areas. Even the MGNREGS which is hailed as the world's largest employment programme has from the beginning been under funded. It just provides the minimum required to keep people above starvation. That has been the bottom line for governments in this country - keep people from starving but don't give them too much that the cost of labour goes up. Therefore, the lockdown has not been badly managed as the bleeding hearts are saying, it has on the contrary been perfectly managed to ensure that favourable conditions for primitive accumulation continue to prevail. 

No comments: